On Oct 15, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Chris Thompson <c...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Oct 15 2012, pa...@riseup.net wrote: > >> no SOA for test.cloudns.tk IMO. see: >> >> PromatoMacBook-Pro:~ pro$ dig test.cloudns.tk soa >> >> ; <<>> DiG 9.7.6-P1 <<>> test.cloudns.tk soa >> ;; global options: +cmd >> ;; Got answer: >> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 60320 >> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 >> >> ;; QUESTION SECTION: >> ;test.cloudns.tk. IN SOA >> >> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: >> cloudns.tk. 300 IN SOA ns0.cloudwebdns.com. >> support.cloudwebdns.com. 1048 >> 7200 1800 604800 300 >> >> ;; Query time: 860 msec >> ;; SERVER: 211.136.192.6#53(211.136.192.6) >> ;; WHEN: Mon Oct 15 21:13:04 2012 >> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 96 >> >> >> The SOA is presented in AUTHORITY SECTION, not in ANSWER SECTION, so it's >> meaningless. > > Indeed, Warren's use of +nostats +ncomments to conceal that was > disingenuous, to say the least. Actually the use of +nostats +nocomments was to try not include detracting info, and I completly missed where the the RR showed up... But, gee, thanks for the implication… W > > But you should notice that the above response - rcode NOERROR with > an empty data section - is what RFC 2308 calls "NODATA", and not an > NXDOMAIN. This is because test.cloudns.tk is an "empty non-terminal" > in the name tree within the zone, and it is that which prevents > *.cloudns.tk from applying to anything under it. > > -- > Chris Thompson > Email: c...@cam.ac.uk > -- Outside of a dog, a book is your best friend, and inside of a dog, it's too dark to read _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
