On Sep 20, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote: > I have several recursive, caching BIND servers
[...] > The current servers are configured to forward any queries for our domain > straight to our authoritative servers [...] > I've been reading about the new zone type: static-stub and believe this may > work better for us. [...] > If I'm correct, it will send non-recursive queries to the listed servers and > will honor delegations. I've tested this configuration in our lab and it all > appears to be working. > > With our configuration, are there any downsides to changing from forward > zones to static-stub? Type static-stub should work great here. Type stub, which has been around since before I started managing DNS servers (a very long time now), would probably also have worked. Chris Buxton BlueCat Networks
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
