On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:03 PM, G.W. Haywood <b...@jubileegroup.co.uk>wrote:
You didn't tell the OP what to use instead of nslookup!
sorry :-)
On 16.03.12 19:33, Ashok Agarwal wrote:
If PTR is present then it works pretty well. My concern is without PTR
record.
Ya I can use "dig" instead to nslookup
you can also use "host", as it simpler and usually gives you what you
need, unless you need to debug DNS itself.
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
the main problem is nslookup itself, and this is just one of
reasons nslookup is not recommended for use.
[...]
but I need to fix it in nslookup as
well.
If anybody has any clue or can tell how it be fixed then it will really
help me and it be highly appreciated.
I have it already explained: It's a problem of nslookup. Either you
will have the PTR, or you will have the error. No other way.
There are too many different versions of "nslookup" program within
different systems, made by different perogrammers. It's just useless
to "fix" nslookup, because that is how nslookup works and that's why we
advise you to use "host" or "dig".
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
