On Feb 9 2012, Peter Andreev wrote:
2012/2/9 John Hascall <j...@iastate.edu>
[...snip...]
(2) It also looks like restarting bind flushes the cache
and that prevents the repopulation of the local cache
with names which are ghosts (new different ghost names
could, of course, be created). Is this correct?
AFAIK 'rndc flush' will do the same.
If you know the domain name in question, "rndc flushname ghost.example"
should be enough. (BIND 9.9 has "rndc flushtree" as well, but I think
clobbering the cached NS records for the ghost domain should be enough.)
--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
