On 30/11/11 12:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30/11/11 10:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Well, that's way too much. The main point of journal is imho to provide
On 30.11.11 11:51, Phil Mayers wrote:
I think this is a decision for each operator to make themselves.
I was trying to explain that there are reasonable limits over which
journalling is useless. However you have deleted the important p
Ha! Nice ;o)
Sorry - the point I was trying to make is that some people may find
journalling beyond the AXFR size useful.
For example: it allows you to use named-journalprint as a primitive time
machine to see old versions of the zone.
But you are correct, as a default the (binary) size of the zone would be
a good default for value of max-journal-size.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
