On Nov 16, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Hajducko, Steven wrote: > Yeah, that's if we wanted to bother recovering it. :) Then there is the > process of recovering the master conf file and setting up notifies and allows > for all the slaves the old master had.
Hmm. If you don't care about recovering the zone data, why were you bothering to serve it in the first place? > We're actually going to move the zones to our Infoblox system, which is why > we wanted to determine if we had enough time or if we had to bother with the > recovery, hence the question. If I had a transition already planned and implemented, and the replacement system was adequately tested to the point where I was willing to switch over early due to an unexpected system failure, then I might consider switching a production system over to something else. The other 99% of the time, if something in production breaks, you replace it with exactly the same thing. Making any kind of infrastructure change is handled in a process which is not emergency recovery from a failure. Regards, -- -Chuck _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
