On Oct 26, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Chris Thompson wrote:
> On Oct 26 2011, Benzi Mizrahi wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've recently upgraded our nameservers from version 9.6.2.-p3 to 9.7.4 ,
>> and the following messages started to appear on all nameservers logs:
>>
>>
>> 22-Oct-2011 16:58:41.548 dispatch: dispatch 5612b0:
>> open_socket(0.0.0.0#2049) -> permission denied: continuing
>> 22-Oct-2011 17:01:02.361 dispatch: dispatch 5612b0:
>> open_socket(0.0.0.0#4045) -> permission denied: continuing
>> 22-Oct-2011 17:10:11.686 dispatch: dispatch 5612b0:
>> open_socket(0.0.0.0#4045) -> permission denied: continuing
>>
>> I need to know how critical these messages are and where can I find some
>> information about what is means?
>>
>> All our nameservers run on SUN sparc machines with Solaris 10.
>
> These ports are the ones used by nfs and lockd. They will be in use
> (and are also privileged, as though they were <1024).
>
> With Solaris I use the following in named.conf options:
>
> use-v4-udp-ports { range 32768 65535; };
> use-v6-udp-ports { range 32768 65535; };
Thank you very much...
>
> This is the same as the (default) anonymous port range.
>
> --
> Chris Thompson
> Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
--
Benzi Mizrahi,
computing center,
Weizmann Institute of Science, Tel: 972-8-9342456
Rehovot, Israel. Fax: 972-8-9344102
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?"
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
