On Oct 25, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Fr34k wrote: > We found someone else who seemed to suggest a "fix" by increasing the number > of sockets. > We figured we would give that a shot and see what would happen. We tried > 128, and then 256 -- but we still see these messages: > named[14050]: [ID 873579 daemon.info] sockmgr 288760: maximum number of FD > events (128) received > named[15910]: [ID 873579 daemon.info] sockmgr 288760: maximum number of FD > events (256) received > > Does anyone have more information, suggestions, comments?
Yes, named probably wants 256 - 1024 filedescriptors as a reasonable lower bounds, depending on load. Busy nameservers might well define FD_SETSIZE higher, to 4096 for example. Regards, -- -Chuck _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
