On 10/06/2011 09:44 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
[ pardon the possible duplicate ]
I'm a fan of RFC 2136 Dynamic DNS and, if I think it appropriate for a
particular use case, sometimes suggest DDNS to customers. I often have
a hard time convincing people to use DDNS and am doubted regarding its
stability and/or performance.
I'm looking for success (or failure) stories to back up my statement :)
For example, I seem to recall hearing the .COM zone uses DDNS for
updates (90 million records, isn't it?).
Are you willing to share the stories of your DDNS deployments, maybe
including approximate number of zones, records, update frequencies,
etc.?
It's a bit of a vague question really.
We use DDNS to incrementally update our DNS zones from our SQL
registration database. It works fine; there's really nothing to say
about it beyond that.
(However, a nice property of doing things this way is that, if using
DNSSEC, you get incremental signing rather than have to bulk re-sign a
potentially large zone)
We don't do any client-initiated (or DHCP-server initiated) DDNS yet.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
