Le 21/09/2011 08:44, Stephane Bortzmeyer a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:55:08AM +0200, > Yanek <hostmas...@abetternet.net> wrote > a message of 42 lines which said: > >> 1/ What is the bind record format for the zone itself? > Strictly speaking, it is not the BIND format but the standard format > (RFC 1035, section 5). However, not all name servers follow it > (standardizing the input file format is regarded as a bad idea, today) > and, anyway, it is underspecified so problems occur even when name > servers try to follow it.
OK, Stéphane, thanks for the welcome summary here. > >> mydomain.tld. IN A 1.2.3.4 >> >> Am I wrong? > This line is correct. Perfect; thank you. I faced a few bind problems about resolving the zone itself (not some host record) but i think that I now fixed the problem. BTW, is it me or @ IN A 1.2.3.4 Could handily replace that record? > >> 2/ What is the bind format for a SPF record, eg: > Again, this is standard, not BIND-specific. RFC 4408: > > 3.1.1. DNS Resource Record Types > > This document defines a new DNS RR of type SPF, code 99. The format > of this type is identical to the TXT RR [RFC1035]. Perfect, clear and easy to understand :) > >> 3/ What is the bind format for a DKIM record, eg: > RFC 4871, section 3.6.2. That's let's obvious, but I think that I'll post here if I can't get it to work :) Thanks again :) _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
