Well, I'm going to run the modified bind on a local testbed disconnected of internet. So, no worries on others, this is just for test, and aid with actual protocol development.
Thanks on the hint, now I have to find out where to dig first. Any knowledge? On Sep 13, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: >> But just for the sake of convenience, is there a way to rename >> TYPE<#> to something that I want? > > If you dig (pun not necessarily intended) into the source of BIND you > can actually change the source so that `named' can read your type from a > zone master file and `dig' displays it however you wish. The way this > is implemented in the BIND source is via a set of rather clever/complex > macros. > > As Warren said though, you'll have to be very careful here, and it will > only be useful to *your* implementation. Say you create a type called > XXYY, if I query your server I'd see the TYPEnnnn representation and not > XXYY. > > -JP > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
