On 08/09/2011 11:17, J. Thomsen wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:18:13 +0000,Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org> wrote:
>
>>> The master now loaded about 650 zones/sec.
>>> The slave did not change from the usual 120 zones/sec.
>>
>> I'm purely guessing, but I wonder if there's some rate-limiting
>> due to the SOA queries slaves have to send to their masters.
>>
>
> You are probably right.
>
> Increasing
>
> transfers-in/out
> transfers-per-ns
> serial-query-rate
>
> on both master and slave improved the slave load time considerably to 577
> zones/sec.
> Which one is the important one to increase, I don't know.
Assuming that the zones were mostly up to date, it was serial-query-rate.
Also, FYI, you're getting pretty close to the point where the
master/slave configuration is going to become a bottleneck. If you plan
to grow much beyond this point you should start looking at making all of
your systems masters and using an out of band method to update the zones.
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
