On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 13:22 -0500, Timothy Stoddard wrote: > Has any one run into a issue with two named processes running on the > same host. We want to begin serving up DNS on our IPv6 address space > and do not want to duplicate each of our DNS servers. We have started > two named processes one with "-6" option. All seems to be working. I > am concerned how journal files will be handled. Question will the > "-4" named process coexist with "-6" on the same box???
Are you nuts?!? Are you planning on just serving IPv6 answers over IPv6 transport and IPv4 answers over IPv4 transport? Please don't try - run dual-stack (every box runs both addressing) and have a single instance of BIND listening on both IPv4 and IPv6 transports.... serving both types of addresses as needed. Your forward zone files should containing both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses (as appropriate). You'll obviously just need to add a suitable zone or two for your IPv6 reverses! (to match your IPv4 reverses). -- . . ___. .__ Posix Systems - Sth Africa /| /| / /__ m...@posix.co.za - Mark J Elkins, Cisco CCIE / |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS Tel: +27 12 807 0590 Cell: +27 82 601 0496
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
