On 19.04.11 15:42, hugo hugoo wrote: > I have in fact the following problem: > > The AXFR is not triggered by a “rndc reload”, neither a stop/start of bind9.
are you doing those on slave? > è nothing is seen in the logs I believe you can see in bind logs at least the fact that you issued "rndc reload" and/or stopped/started BIND. > The AXFR is triggered by a “rndc reload zonename”. in fact, after you ask slave to issue relaod specific zone, the slave checks whether the zone needs to be reloaded. > => logs of the master > > pr 19 17:32:03 dnscustmaster901 named[5672]: client 194.78.73.88#37854: > transfer of 'bind9testcarlos.be/IN': AXFR-style IXFR started > Apr 19 17:32:03 dnscustmaster901 named[5672]: client 194.78.73.88#37854: > transfer of 'bind9testcarlos.be/IN': AXFR-style IXFR ended > > > è logs in the slave > > pr 19 17:32:10 lennydnstest01 named[4614]: received control channel command > 'reload bind9testcarlos.be' > Apr 19 17:32:10 lennydnstest01 named[4614]: zone bind9testcarlos.be/IN: > Transfer started. > Apr 19 17:32:10 lennydnstest01 named[4614]: transfer of > 'bind9testcarlos.be/IN' from 194.78.73.65#53: connected using > 194.78.73.88#37854 > Apr 19 17:32:10 lennydnstest01 named[4614]: zone bind9testcarlos.be/IN: > transferred serial 1999101714 > Apr 19 17:32:10 lennydnstest01 named[4614]: transfer of > 'bind9testcarlos.be/IN' from 194.78.73.65#53: Transfer completed: 1 messages, > 8 records, 250 bytes, 0.005 secs (50000 bytes/sec) > > Is this behavior normal? this is normal log of a zone transfer. > On the slave: (before the rndc reload zonename) what's on the slave AFTER reload zonename? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
