On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Warren Kumari wrote:

After having tried to use the distribution supplied packages (for multiple 
distributions) my opinion is that building from source is the right answer for 
BIND. The distributions lag more than I'm comfortable with, and BIND builds 
cleanly from source with mo muss, no fuss....

disclaimer: I'm a passive co-maintainer of bind in rhel/fedora (with Adam doing 
all the work)

If you just want a newer version of bind on RHEL, then I strongly recommend 
grabbing the
existing source rpm, downloading the new bind source, and recompiling using the 
spec file
as much as possible, eg:

yumdownloader --source bind
yum install rpm-build
rpm -hiv bind*src.rpm
cd ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES
wget ftp://ftp.isc.org/....../bind-9.8.x.tar.gz
[edit ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/bind.spec and update the version to the latest bind 
source)
rpmbuild -ba ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/bind.spec
rpm -Uhv ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/bind-9.8.x-1*rpm

You might need to disable a patch that got merged upstream, or a patch that has 
not
been converted yet to the new upstream source if your build fails to compile.

This will ensure compatibility with RHEL, for instance with initscripts, 
SElinux, etc.

Alternatively, you can look into the "development tree" for RHEL, called 
"Fedora".
Fedora is on a 6 month release cycle and releases updates more often. But take 
note
that you're exchanging stability and testing for a more rapid new version 
deployment.

Paul
ps. You can catch me tomorrow at the ICANN DNSSEC panel where I will talk about 
DNSSEC
    and Fedora/RHEL.
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to