i've bind9 running as a primaryhost to a number of bind-andb-other
slaves.
i'm trying to set up to use different TSIG keys with different
secondaries.
in my named.conf, i've
...
acl acl_slave_1 { 1.1.1.1; };
acl acl_slave_2 { 2.2.2.2; 3.3.3.3; 4.4.4.4; 5.5.5.5; };
...
zone "test.com" {
type master; file "/master/test.com.hosts";
allow-transfer { { !{!1.1.1.1;}; key key-slave-1; }; {
!{!acl_slave_2;}; key key-slave-2; }; };
allow-update { none; };
};
...
key "key-slave-1" { algorithm hmac-md5; secret "Cf...g=="; };
key "key-slave-2" { algorithm hmac-md5; secret "rl...8=="; };
in this conf, IXFR to 1.1.1.1 with TSIG works as expected. but, *NO*
IXFR occurs to any slave in acl_slave_2{}.
if, however, I change to
--- allow-transfer { { !{!1.1.1.1;}; key key-slave-1; }; {
!{!acl_slave_2;}; key key-slave-2; }; };
+++ allow-transfer { { !{!1.1.1.1;}; key key-slave-1; }; {
!{!2.2.2.2;}; key key-slave-2; }; };
IXFR to 1.1.1.1 & 2.2.2.2 both occur OK with TSIG.
also, with
--- allow-transfer { { !{!1.1.1.1;}; key key-slave-1; }; {
!{!acl_slave_2;}; key key-slave-2; }; };
--- allow-transfer { { !{!1.1.1.1;}; key key-slave-1; };
acl_slave_2; };
IXFR to 1.1.1.1 with TSIG & to all slaves in acl_slave_2{}, without
TSIG, both occur OK.
what's the right syntax for enabling IXFR to the entire TSIG- &
IP-restricted set of hosts in acl_slave_2{}?
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
