Does anyone know what happens if a domain with an older TXT spf record is included in a newer SPF spf record? For example:
foo.com IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a:mail1.foo.com a:mail2.foo.com ?all" bar.com IN SPF "v=spf1 mx a:mail1.bar.com a:mail2.bar.com include:foo.com ?all" Ideally the desire is that the authorized mail hosts at foo.com are also authorized to send mail on behalf of the bar.com domain. My question is will the SPF record for bar.com be valid if foo.com only has a TXT spf record or would foo.com need to have a record of the SPF record type? I'm guessing that BIND doesn't do the recursion to resolve the include statement itself and this may be dependent on the mail agent doing the query. -- Timothy A. Holtzen Campus Network Administrator Nebraska Wesleyan University _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
