On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 11:44:18AM +0000, Brian J. Murrell <br...@interlinx.bc.ca> wrote a message of 46 lines which said:
> named error (broken trust chain) resolving '133.168.163.66.sa- > trusted.bondedsender.org/TXT/IN': 173.45.100.146#53 > > Where/why does it break? Who's is breaking it? I can see that > org. is rife with DNSSEC data but that bondedsender.org. is > completely void of it. But surely that would be the case of a plain > insecure delegation, yes? Indeed. Your analysis seems right. May be you have somewhere another trust anchor (for d...@isc or directly for bondedsender.org?) Another possibility: sa-trusted.bondedsender.org is badly lame (none of the name servers reply), so it may trigger a bad error message from BIND. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
