There was a report on NANOG about this earlier. We are getting responses, but they were a bit slow to resolve.
Michael Hare wrote: > Hello- > > Our recursive nameservers are having trouble with .MIL today. I see > some public servers [8.8.8.8] are not. I am not running a dns-sec > enabled recursive resolver. > > In the below I was expecting an 'ADDITIONAL' section, not based on the > DIG header, but based on expecting delegation glue. A dig for the > NIPR.MIL NS times out. > > Anyone else having problems or can perhaps point me in the right direction? > > Thanks- > -Michael > > [...@trigger ~]$ dig MIL NS > > ; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P2 <<>> MIL NS > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6544 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;MIL. IN NS > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > MIL. 69821 IN NS EUR2.NIPR.MIL. > MIL. 69821 IN NS PAC2.NIPR.MIL. > MIL. 69821 IN NS EUR1.NIPR.MIL. > MIL. 69821 IN NS PAC1.NIPR.MIL. > MIL. 69821 IN NS CON1.NIPR.MIL. > MIL. 69821 IN NS CON2.NIPR.MIL. > > ;; Query time: 0 msec > ;; SERVER: 128.104.254.254#53(128.104.254.254) > ;; WHEN: Mon Oct 25 15:56:40 2010 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 140 > _______________________________________________ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- ------------------------------------ Steven Kent Chief Technical Officer onShore Networks http://www.onshore.com fingerprint: pub 1024D/D2779F66 2004-04-07 _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
