On 18/10/10 01:16, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/16/2010 4:58 AM, Klaus Malorny wrote:
[...]
It's virtually certain that you would get better results with less effort by
switching to using dynamic updates.
hth,
Doug
Hi Doug,
well, I considered this, but as far as I understand, there are some non-trivial
problems with RFC 2136:
- can't create or drop zones -> still need to use the classic approach
- updates limited to a single message (64k limit via TCP), requiring
the updates to be split if need be -> problems regarding atomicity,
query integrity during update, serial numbers
also, this is only considered as an interim solution until Bind10 becomes
suitable for our needs.
Regards,
Klaus
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
