On 10/11/2010 3:26 PM, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote:
Hello Alans,


Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:07:40 +0300 Alans wrote:

Why not? OpenDNS is a good example i think.
Good example? Was it a joke? Do the traceroute on IP addresses of the
two OpenDNS resolvers and you'll find that they both are behind the
same router. Do you still trust the OpenDNS people who advertise their
service as reliable?

You are kidding right?  ...or was this post a joke?

OpenDNS is Anycast - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anycast

Here is an DNS Stuff Vector Trace for 208.67.222.222 (one of OpenDNS' resolvers): http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/vectortrace?ip=208.67.222.222&token=26314c5ba0c8ae4e2c32430c19d55018

Note that end points are very local to the widely spread start points.

From any one location an IP Anycast service will appear to be very local. That is the point.

P.S. Please don't top-post - this breaks the logic of the discussion
thread. Thank you.

regards,
Alans

On 10/11/2010 07:37 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 11.10.10 14:16, Alans wrote:
Thanks Dave, yes i know about OpenDNS, I'm trying to imlement
somehting kind of similar to that in a small scale.
So i was wondering about Bind dns capabilities and may be third
party stuffs that could integrate with bind dns in addition to the
ip/website list.
This is NOT something BIND (or any DNS server) should do. Blocking
web sites is business for web proxies, firewalls etc. Doing this
stuff at DNS level could lead to many surprises.


--
-___________________________________
David Miller
Tiggee LLC
dmil...@tiggee.com

_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to