its as if they think hackers main source of targets comes from here. doesn't appear to really want any help anyway.
-g On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:35 PM, Noel Butler wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:29 -0500, Lyle Giese wrote: >> Dotan Cohen wrote: > >>> The ports aren't blocked as another site (example.eu) hosted on the >>> 1.1.1.1 server works fine. The working site has both nameservers >>> pointed to that same server (on two different IP addresses on eth0 and >>> etho0:0). Only the example.de site which has one nameserver on the >>> 1.1.1.1 machine and the second nameserver on 1.1.2.2 is giving me a >>> headache. >>> >>> >>> >> I would like to help but since you are refusing to post the real ip address >> or the real hostnames or the real domain names involved, I can not. I could >> do some testing from here to see if your firewall was configured correctly >> or what the view was from outside your network. But I can not. >> > > Quite right, too many people with paranoia come here looking for help but > refuse to let us do correct remote testing. > First post was 7.08am local, its 3 /12 hours later and we still have no real > info, had it been supplied his problem may been identified and resolved 3 > hours ago. > > > <ATT00002..txt> _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
