IME the best way to do this on a Unix'y system is to use hard links.
That way if you ever need to change one of them to be its own file
it's trivial to do so. Also IME, BIND doesn't react well to having
multiple slave zones sharing the same file, but that may have improved
in more recent versions, I haven't tried it for a couple of years now.

Thanks Doug, but I'm not entirely clear on what you're recommending? It
seems like you're saying it's OK, but then you're saying BIND doesn't
like it?

I'm guessing then that you're not running BIND on a Unix system. In any case, Mark is in a much better position than I to state categorically, "Don't do that" so I am happy to defer to his wisdom.

Just use different files for each zone. Yes, it's a bit of duplication on the file system, but that's not the end of the world. Disk is cheap, DNS failure i

Thanks Doug/Mark...I ended up just doing it the "right" way ;)


_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to