Hi i read that 'old' bind version where better when threading was disabled. Load balancing between 2 processe was better. Is this always the case ? http://zaphods.net/~zaphodb/high-performance-bind9.html
some interesting links for DNS performance : http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/Building_Scalable_DNS_Cluster_using_LVS https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2006-September/063917.html Philippe > -----Original Message----- > From: bind-users-bounces+philippe.simonet=swisscom....@lists.isc.org > [mailto:bind-users-bounces+philippe.simonet=swisscom....@lists.isc.org] > On Behalf Of Eivind Olsen > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 09:56 > To: bind-us...@isc.org > Subject: How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading? > > Does anyone know if there are any benchmarks out in the public, which > could give some insight into how well BIND 9 scales with multithreading? > I've tried looking on this list, and googling, but haven't found anything > yet. > > To be a bit more specific - I'm not sure what a good option for server > hardware would be for a recursive DNS server. On one hand, the Sun (ok, > Oracle) Niagara/Coolthreads architecture seems to work nicely enough, but > maybe I'd be better off with some generic Intel/AMD based solution with > fewer threads/cores but higher GHz per thread? > > Regards > Eivind Olsen > > > _______________________________________________ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
