In message <y2sf7e964441005031927m7774769ev280156817d8b4...@mail.gmail.com>, Je ff Pang writes: > Hello, > > Following the discussions in the list, I made a test on one of our > servers, which is in an ISP's datacenter. > > The result is below: > > $ dig +short rs.dns-oarc.net txt > rst.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net. > rst.x485.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net. > rst.x490.x485.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net. > "218.204.255.72 DNS reply size limit is at least 490" > "218.204.255.72 lacks EDNS, defaults to 512" > "Tested at 2010-05-04 02:23:51 UTC" > > Does this mean our ISP's filrewall block EDNS query/response?
Maybe / maybe not. It could just mean that the nameserver itself doesn't support EDNS. > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
