On 03/16/10 22:17, Mark Andrews wrote:
> ESV's are supposed to be releases which are stable, no dot-o-itis.
I'm not suggesting that they should be the latter, thus my comment that
what I _thought_ would happen is that once the dot-releases were done in
a given branch the -ESV would start. Frankly I find the plan as you've
laid it out at best odd and confusing. I would be willing to wager I
won't be alone in that, but time will tell.
> We didn't feel 9.6.1 was stable enough so we waited for 9.6.2. You
> could always follow 9.6.x and then apply whatever changes to 9.6-ESV
> appear after the final 9.6.x version.
Yes, that's sort of how I'm leaning now, but I will have to wait and see
how things play out. I'm just kind of disappointed that what seemed like
it would be a clear path is now going to be considerably more murky. :-/
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
