In message <4b8586a0.2030...@isc.org>, Alan Clegg writes:
> Dan Letkeman wrote:
>
> > I think I have a configuration issue somewhere. It looks like from
> > the logs that my master server is notifying the slaves correctly, but
> > then the other slaves are also notifying the slaves as well.
> >=20
> > 172.16.0.100 is the master
> > 172.16.0.101 is 1st slave
> > 172.16.0.102 is 2nd slave
>
> Zone transfers can take place between slaves as well. If you want to
> limit the number of NOTIFY messages, you may want to look into:
>
> "also-notify { list; };"
> and
> "notify explicit;"
>
> What you are seeing is in the case where you have a master server that
> is not visible to all slaves -- slaves must be able to let their peers
> know that they themselves have been updated.
And "notify master-only;" in later versions of named.
> AlanC
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
