On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Barry Margolin wrote: > In article <mailman.1304.1260905564.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, > Chris Buxton <cbux...@menandmice.com> wrote: > >> It's not a valid delegation unless you control the parent zone. >> >> ARIN is delegating the /24 reverse zone to you. You therefore have four >> options that give control of the PTR records to the midwestfirst.com servers. > > A fifth option is to use RFC 2317-style classless delegation for all 256 > entries in the reverse domain: > > $GENERATE 0-255 $ IN CNAME $.0/24 > 0/24 IN NS ns1.midwestfirst.com. > 0/24 IN NS ns2.midwestfirst.com. > > Then have the customer change the name of their reverse zone to > 0/24.188.134.63.in-addr.arpa.
That approach was included with my option 3. I prefer the DNAME approach (instead of individual CNAME's) in this case, but that's just my opinion. I would never recommend following that RFC's pattern of addr/mask (i.e. 0/24 in this case). Use something else, like "mw", as the artificially-added label. Chris Buxton Professional Services Men & Mice _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
