Hi!

On some of our (linux based) DNS server's the BIND just hangs; the combination 
was fairly old hardware and fairly new OS/BIND. Couldn't figure it out either 
until I came up with https://www.isc.org/node/302.

At least you could try it, I found no harm on setting the 
/proc/sys/net/core/xfrm_larval_drop to 1 just to be on the safe side...

--
Tommi Nikkilä
System Specialist

-----Original Message-----
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org 
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Justin Shore
Sent: 28. lokakuuta 2009 7:30
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: 2 simultaneous hung Bind boxes

I got a call from a remote tech earlier this evening.  He was at home on our 
service and couldn't get on the Internet.  His IP connectivity was fine and 
could hit my NOC website via IP only.  DNS however was hosed. 
About the time I got in a position to check the bind logs and sniff his traffic 
the problem went away.  We chocked it up to a local problem until a few minutes 
later across the SP network I too experienced the same thing.  My DNS requests 
simply timed out.  I turned on querylog on our boxes and could see what 
appeared to be successful hits and replies. 
  The boxes were just not replying to queries.  Traffic on our main upstream 
dropped by about 90% within a few short minutes (users' DNS stopped and 
outbound usage ground to a halt basically).  Not knowing what else to try I 
restart bind on both NSs.  That fixed it.

The boxes are running fairly old Bind code, 9.5.1b2.  Tomorrow I will upgrade 
to 9.6.1rc1 (unless people believe 9.7.0b1 is ready for use). 
My question is are there any known ways for a crafted query or crafted reply to 
cause what I've described on that old release of Bind?  I recall hearing about 
assorted things over the past couple of years though I thought that they were 
things that would cause actual crashing, not the mentally hosing my boxes 
appeared to take this evening.  Does anything else come to mind?  The views on 
the servers only permit recursive lookups internally from our customer 
prefixes.  Externally you can only get responses for things that we have 
authority over.  Thoughts?

Thanks
  Justin
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to