Mandriva 2009.1 Bind 9.6.0-P1. Mandriva downloaded a security update this morning for Bind. When restarting I noticed the above line in my syslog. Running
[r...@localhost ~]# named-checkconf -z /etc/named.conf:17: open: /etc/bogon_acl.conf: file not found The permissions for the files in /var/lib/named/etc are: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1966 2009-07-29 07:57 bogon_acl.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42 2009-07-29 07:57 hosts -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3543 2009-07-30 17:09 localtime -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2165 2009-05-13 20:44 logging.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2123 2009-03-08 09:11 logging.conf~ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2165 2009-05-03 19:03 logging.conf.rpmsave -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3950 2009-05-09 20:06 named.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4125 2009-05-09 19:38 named.conf.rpmsave -rw-r----- 1 root named 350 2009-05-09 19:56 rndc.conf -rw-r----- 1 root named 350 2009-05-03 15:31 rndc.conf.rpmsave -rw-r----- 1 root named 259 2009-05-09 19:56 rndc.key -rw-r----- 1 root named 259 2009-05-03 15:31 rndc.key.rpmsave -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 627 2009-07-29 07:57 trusted_networks_acl.conf Permissions for /var/lib/named [ch...@localhost named]$ ls -l total 16 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2009-07-29 07:57 dev/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2009-07-30 17:09 etc/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2954 2009-02-15 05:18 named.ca dr-xr-xr-x 173 root root 0 2009-07-08 19:44 proc/ drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 2009-07-29 07:57 var/ Permissions for /var/lib/named/var [ch...@localhost var]$ ls -l total 16 drwxr-xr-x 3 named named 4096 2009-07-29 07:57 log/ drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-07-30 06:11 named/ drwxr-xr-x 2 named named 4096 2009-07-30 17:09 run/ drwxr-xr-x 2 named named 4096 2009-07-29 07:57 tmp/ File permissions in /var/lib/named/var/named: [ch...@localhost named]$ ls -l total 16 drwxr-xr-x 2 named named 4096 2009-07-30 06:11 master/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2954 2009-07-29 07:57 named.ca drwxr-xr-x 2 named named 4096 2009-07-30 06:11 reverse/ drwxr-xr-x 2 named named 4096 2009-07-29 07:57 slaves/ Or is everything ok and the the line in the subject can be ignored? Thanks Chris Note - I'm only using bind as a local caching name server on my stand alone, single user box to speed up spam processing. -- KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
