Thanks to both Chris and Matthew for solutions that worked. I knew there had to be an easy way ;)
I'll be using the delegation method for one of the two dhcp zones (works out better for network traffic), and indeed, the hunch that just loading a more specific zone worked if you don't want to do the delegation (like I'm now doing for the other zone!) John -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Pounsett [mailto:m...@conundrum.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:58 PM To: John Cole Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Delegation of DHCP blocks within same server? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 20-May-2009, at 19:03, John Cole wrote: > For a concrete example: > > 10.0.0.0/16 is presently handled by a single zone file. > 10.1.3.0/24 is DHCP issued > 10.1.4.0/24 is DHCP issued I haven't tested this... but I'm 99% certain that you can simply load them as three separate zones, exactly as you might expect. BIND should recognize that the zone{} statements for 10.1.3/24 and 10.1.4/24 are more-specific than what's in 10.0/16 and act accordingly. Along those same lines, if you happen to have data for either 10.1.3/24 or 10.1.4/24 inside the 10.0/16 zone file, you should get an error. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkoUmPAACgkQmFeRJ0tjIxGe4gCgkhfqzbwL9BcT4MtXtqQSMQ08 pmEAn2YNy86QLMcpPd8Rl09d965NskJc =2nvo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
