I find a more direct approach is to just use the tools.ietf.org site when looking up RFCs. It is is less authoritative, but pretty trustworthy.
For example, browing to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1034 will show at the page top all the RFCs which update RFC 1034. If the RFC was obsoleted by another RFC, it would be shown there as well (e.g., http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc973) -josh Doug Barton wrote: > Matthew Pounsett wrote: > >> On 25-Feb-2009, at 16:46, Mike Bernhardt wrote: >> >> >>> So what is the accepted view on this currently? Is there another RFC that >>> has made it OK now? >>> >> I'm not going to say this definitively, because I'm not certain, but I >> think 952 may have been updated by a later RFC. >> > > There is no reason to guess. :) Just use the RFC Editor's > authoritative index. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index.html > > Doug > _______________________________________________ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > -- ===================================================================== Josh Littlefield Cisco Systems, Inc. jo...@cisco.com 1414 Massachusetts Avenue tel: 978-936-1379 fax: 978-936-2226 Boxborough, MA 01719-2205 _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
