On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:25:35PM -0600, bsfin...@anl.gov <bsfin...@anl.gov> wrote a message of 41 lines which said:
> One downside - if you have many NS records, then they might not all > fit in one UDP packet Let me demonstrate a bit of pedantism: the correct sentence is rather "they might not all fit in a traditional DNS UDP packet (512 bytes)". The limit is not UDP's fault. And even with DNS, EDNS0 allows more than 512 bytes and is now an old technology. > This will cause the protocol to revert to TCP. Not with EDNS0 (which is enabled by default on BIND). _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
