In article <gl8hdv$228...@sf1.isc.org>, "Jeremy C. Reed" <jeremy_r...@isc.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Rich Goodson wrote: > > > And I'm expected to know this, how? (incidentally, I added a 'wait' > > statement to my script after I discovered this behavior). This behavior > > does not appear to be what the documentation describes, is all I'm > > trying to say. > > Just to clarify the documentation part: > > Stop the server immediately. > > Maybe we should just remove the "immediately" part. > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. Nothing happens instantaneously. This just tells it to stop immediately, but it still takes time for it to obey the command. Consider the analogy: if I call you and tell you to come to my house immediately, it will take you a few seconds to get to your car, then some number of minutes to drive here. The documentation even says that the purpose of returning the PID is so that you can tell when the process has actually gone away. What would be the point if the command didn't returning until the process had exited? -- Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
