I see it all the time on both sides of the fence. I personally support it because even though I sometimes am impacted by it, the amount of actual spam I filter out because of this is significant.
>> - it's clear violation of RFC 5321 (and former 2821, 821) - server MUST NOT >> reject connection because of that. >> > > In today's spam-filled environment, a "MUST NOT" from RFC 5321 probably > rates considerably lower than reducing the total amount of spam. So > *if* a postmaster finds out that rejecting mail due to such a mismatch > indeed reduces the spam level for his users - he'll probably do it. He > may not even have any idea what the RFC says... > _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
