Thanks for your input

/Jonathan


On Jan 3, 2009, at 16:13, Mark Andrews <mark_andr...@isc.org> wrote:


In message <fa2e1350901031122w75768929h3b17e0a47b806...@mail.gmail.com>, "Jonathan Petersson"
writes:
Hi all,

Hopefully this post wont cause as much SPAM as my last one. About a
year ago I started looking into DNSSEC and how to work with it for
dynamic updates etc. Since only NSEC was supported, allowing whomever
to do a unauthorized zone-transfer I canceled my projects later
finding out that NSEC3 would stop the behavior.

   One really needs to look at the cost benefit analysis to
   decide whether to use NSEC or NSEC3.  NSEC3 is much more
   expensive than NSEC3 for both authoritative servers and
   validators than NSEC.  There are almost no zone that need
   that level of protection.

   Stopping AXFR/IXFR has almost zero cost so for many people
   it has become reflex without any need to justify it.  Stopping
   zone enumeration has a relatively high cost.

   Note for many servers stopping AXFR/IXFR was not about the
   zone content and more about preserving file descriptors for
   use by the slaves and legitimate TCP clients rather than the
   curious.

With the release of BIND 9.6 my understanding is that NSEC3 is now
supported, however, after reading the DNSSEC ARM for 9.6 I'm pretty
clueless as whether there's any magic sauce to get NSEC3 records vs.
NSEC.

If anyone has a pointer that would be of help, I've tried using
NSEC3RSASHA1 keys without success of getting NSEC3 records.

   NSEC3RSASHA1 allows the use of either NSEC and NSEC3 when
   signing the zone.  You need to tell dnssec-signzone which
   one to use.

   dnssec-signzone -3 salt [-H iterations] [-A] ....

Thx

/Jonathan
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: mark_andr...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to