I call it assertive but defensively.

Mike Rewey

 

On 9 Oct 2009 at 11:04, India Rose Viola wrote:

> Kel,
> 
> Well stated.  Although I would argue that there is a difference between 
> riding defensively and riding fearfully.  There are multiple components to 
> cycling defensively,  one of which is holding a straight, predictable course. 
> This doesn't mean that you have to ride over potholes or into other 
> obstacles, it just means that you anticipate them far enough in advance to 
> ride in a long diagonal course around them in order to avoid sudden 
> side-to-side maneuvers; Other types of defensive riding include looking both 
> ways at every intersection- even if the light is green or it is a one-way 
> street, and yielding to moving cars no matter who is in the "right".  It's a 
> matter of semantics, but I think it's important to put it out there that 
> riding defensively is a good thing- and doing it well is a skillset worth 
> taking the time to learn.
> 
> -india
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, October 9, 2009 10:46 am
> Subject: Re: [Bikies] Sharrows on E Wilson
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Bikies <[email protected]>
> 
> > Bicyclists tend to ride defensively, which, perhaps counterintuitively,
> > puts them at greater risk. I took a short ride with my cousin, who is 
> > in
> > his late 50s, and lives in a city of some 10,000 people. I was a bit
> > horrified to see him duck to the right wherever possible, to hug the curb
> > as much as possible. As a result, he was basically weaving around parked
> > cars and presenting himself as a meandering line along the edge of the
> > road.
> > 
> > Riding more confidently as far to the right as *practicable*, but
> > presenting a consistent profile, is safer. The existence of sharrows
> > provides the bicyclist with the confidence to take that route and notifies
> > the motorists that bicyclists will be taking that route.
> > 
> > Predictability tends to reduce conflict, more or less in all interactions.
> > 
> > > All good points.  But, just curious...you would be riding erratically
> > > without the sharrows...because...why?    (:
> > >
> > >      ~kel
> > >
> > > Daniel Liu writes:
> > >
> > >> I agree, it's exceedingly valuable to let drivers know that bicyclists
> > >> are not only allowed, but supposed to be in lanes marked with  sharrows.
> > >> I've found it's a great boost in my confidence as well, and  I don't
> > >> ride
> > >> as erratically in the lane as I do in unmarked ones.
> > >>
> > >> As far as road markers go, it's nicely subtle, and works best when 
> > you
> > >> know what else is around you âEUR" just like most other road markers, 
> > like
> > >> crosswalks or yield markers. They're starting to appear in a lot of
> > >> other
> > >> cities as well. I saw them first in San Francisco and Los  Angeles, 
> > and
> > >> both Seattle and Portland have painted a lot of them in  the last few
> > >> years. The chevrons and the exact size seem to be the key  indicators:
> > >> to
> > >> let people know that "bikes can go here" in the  positive sense, not
> > >> "only
> > >> bikes here." I don't think many people would  get them confused with
> > >> striped bike lanes, in part because sharrows  should be painted only
> > >> where
> > >> there no separate bike lanes, and mostly  on busier streets. (Johnson
> > >> north of Ingersoll would be a great place  to put some down.)
> > >>
> > >> --Dan Liu
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 8 Oct, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Bill Obermeyer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I like the idea of a marking that encourages people to ride on  streets
> > >>> and encourages people in cars to share the road.   Letting  motorists
> > >>> know that it is OK for bicyclists to "take the lane" is  priceless.
> > >>> It's
> > >>> great that something is being done about E. Wilson.
> > >>>         That said, I'm a bit skeptical about these particular markings 
> > >>> in 
> >  the
> > >>> long term.   If we don't instantly recognize the meaning of the
> > >>> symbol,
> > >>> what are the chances that someone who is not a bicyclist  will do 
> > so?
> > >>> An education campaign would help - 'though it would  not help
> > >>> out-of-towners.
> > >>>         The symbol, at first glance, looked like an enhanced bike lane
> > >>> marking
> > >>> to me.   If people get in the habit of driving over bike  silhouettes,
> > >>> will people be able tell the difference between  sharrows and bike
> > >>> lanes
> > >>> when they are driving.  Will we have to add  markings to the bike 
> > lanes
> > >>> to make it clear that a silhouette  without chevrons means that no 
> > cars
> > >>> are allowed?  From what I  understand, a research project about
> > >>> effectiveness is ongoing.
> > >>> -Bill
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:48 AM, Mitchell Nussbaum wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I'd like to see them on the on-street segments of the Lake Monona
> > >>>> Loop.
> > >>>> No guarantees that they would prevent crashes at the Dempsey/ Cottage
> > >>>> Grove
> > >>>> intersection, but they might, if they encouraged bikes to ride in 
> > the
> > >>>> street instead of hiding on the sidewalk.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Michael Rewey wrote:
> > >>>>> Sharrows are being placed on East Wilson between the bike path
> > >>>>> segments!
> > >>>>> Cool.  They
> > >>>>> probally aren't really needed for bike-motor vehicle safety on this
> > >>>>> street, but its a great idea
> > >>>>> to place them on street segments that are part of the path  system.
> > >>>>> Good
> > >>>>> for continuity.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Other street segments might be Olin-Turville Park Road and the short
> > >>>>> street segments on
> > >>>>> the the Starkweather Path.  Waunona Way?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Mike Rewey
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> Bikies mailing list
> > >>>>> [email protected]
> > >>>>> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Bikies mailing list
> > >>>> [email protected]
> > >>>> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Bikies mailing list
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Bikies mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bikies mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bikies mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> _______________________________________________
> Bikies mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org


_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to