Hi Ryan,
Not sure how you see that as a personal attack? Fact is, I think
spending half a day on something does earns it a note in the weekly report.
And yes, I was frustrated spending time having to demo the issue after
explaining it's cause/source, finding again the exact use case
triggering it, rebuilding both branch and master to ensure it was proper
example, etc. We all have (tight) schedules and I was frustrated this
was considered high priority enough to take it over more pressing
matters for Blender 3.0 upcoming BCon2.
I know that expressing personal frustration may not be a good idea, but
that does not in any case make it a personal attack, sorry if you felt
it like that.
Cheers,
Bastien.
On 9/21/21 8:49 AM, Ryan Inch via Bf-committers wrote:
Hello Dalai,
I missed reading Bastien's weekly notes last week or I would have
brought this issue up then. In Bastien's notes for Week 425 - 09/04
to 09/10, one of his notes is this: "Spent time on
re-explaining/re-investigating T9599 (sigh…)."
In what case is it acceptable for a developer to put something like
this in their official weekly development notes? I was under the
impression that personal attacks were not tolerated? (And for the
record it's D9599 not T)
Ryan
_______________________________________________
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
List details, subscription details or unsubscribe:
https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
_______________________________________________
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
List details, subscription details or unsubscribe:
https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
