Re: add-ons in a repository vs distrubuted with blender. I think there are pros and cons to this but ultimately I think it's an overall good idea.
I won't repeat all the points made previously but had a couple more thoughts. 1. The curation of this hypothetical repo and dealing with commercial add-ons or verifying quality or license seems the biggest hurdle to get this done. 2. Someone earlier in the thread mentioned using pypi directly as the add-on repo. I'm not sure that is the right idea but it does bring an interesting point that many addons have to load packages from pip. So maybe as a sidebar if there was a mechanisim to run "pip install Foo" as part of the addon download that would be a nice other benefit. 3. If the biggest complaint here from addons bundled with blender is that they don't get marketed "enough" in their view with the release of blender, that seems like a completely orthogonal issue to how add-ons are delivered. Brian -- brian.sav...@gmail.com 508-274-8700 _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org List details, subscription details or unsubscribe: https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
