Hi, > What are the ideas about backwards compatibility of the image node/file output node?
The 'File Output' seems to be pretty backward compatible. The one in trunk seems like a subset of the one in Tiles. What is wrong with creating an output node set with the scene parameters (image type, compression, ...)? Cheers, Dalai 2012/5/6 Jeroen Bakker <j.bak...@atmind.nl> > Hi All, > > We have some issues with the new image node. Users are creating files > with trunk and read them using tiles. And it crashes :) > > for example: > * > > http://projects.blender.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=31329&group_id=9&atid=524 > * > > http://projects.blender.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=31300&group_id=9&atid=524 > * > > http://projects.blender.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=31301&group_id=9&atid=524 > > These 3 bugs are related to the fact that the new image node, using > socket storage in stead of the index of the socket. This issue can be > solved after merging. Just as the new file output node. > > Question remains; > What are the ideas about backwards compatibility of the image node/file > output node? > > Greetings, > Jeroen & Monique > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
