Hi Himanshu, Thank you for the presentation of draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-optimized-cs-sr <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-optimized-cs-sr/>. If I understood your response to Ali correctly, the proposed mechanism is expected to use more aggressive network failure detection than the link layer. If that is correct, I have several questions about the multi-layer OAM:
- AFAIK link-layer failures are detected within 10 ms using a connectivity check mechanism (CCM of Y.1731 or a single-hop BFD) with a 3.3 ms interval. - If the link failure is detectable within 10 ms, what detection time for the path, i.e., E2E connection failure detection, is suggested? What interval between test probes will be used in that case? - Furthermore, even if the path converges around the link failure before the local protection is deployed, the link failure will be detected, and the protection mechanism will be deployed despite the Orchestrator setting up its recovery path in the network. If that is correct, local defect detection and protection are unnecessary overheads. Would you agree? Regards, Greg
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
