Hi Joe, Thanks for your review of the document. The nits that you've caught will be addressed in the next version of the document.
Thanks, Ketan On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 3:26 PM Joe Clarke via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Joe Clarke > Review result: Has Nits > > I have been asked to review this draft on behalf of the OPS directorate. > This > draft updates RFC9252 to add clarity for processing SRv6 SID > advertisements for > SRv6 endpoint behaviors that support arguments. From an OPS perspective, I > think this document is ready. I particularly appreciated the call to log > likely config errors to aid with troubleshooting. The additional examples > were > also helpful. > > Overall, I only found two small nits. In Section 3: > > s/The procedures in this document remains/The procedures in this document > remain/ > > And in Section 4: > > s/the alternative method specified in document/the alternative method > specified > in this document/ > > > >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
