Hi Authors,

Could you please reply to this new IPR poll regarding 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking ?

Thanks in advance,

Stephane


From: Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) <slitk...@cisco.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 7:59 PM
To: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) <jorge.rabadan=40nokia....@dmarc.ietf.org>; 
slitkows.i...@gmail.com; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org; 
bess@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12

Thanks Jorge.

Yeah, as the IPR call was done a long time ago, I want to ensure we capture any 
new IPR disclosure before we send to IESG.


From: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) 
<jorge.rabadan=40nokia....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:jorge.rabadan=40nokia....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 2:00 PM
To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com<mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com>; Stephane Litkowski 
(slitkows) <slitk...@cisco.com<mailto:slitk...@cisco.com>>; 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org>;
 bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12

Hi Stephane,

Version 13 posted, addressing all the comments in the WG last call.

Also I’m not aware of any related IPR.
(sorry, it was not clear to me if we, authors, had to reply again with this).

Thanks!
Jorge

From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com<mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com> 
<slitkows.i...@gmail.com<mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 12:27 AM
To: 'Stephane Litkowski (slitkows)' 
<slitkows=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:slitkows=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>>,
 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org>
 
<draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org>>,
 bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12

CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links 
or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.


Hi WG,

WGLC is now closed.

We received few comments during this WGLC. Authors, please address them in a 
new version.

I’m also waiting for the IPR disclosure replies and then we can move forward 
with the draft.

Thanks in advance,

From: Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) 
<slitkows=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:slitkows=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 11:25 AM
To: 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org>;
 bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12

Hi,

As draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking went through multiple discussions 
that seem to be closed now. We would like to do a new short WGLC of 1-week to 
gather any additional comment before we move forward with the draft.

The WGLC poll starts today and will end on 2/3.

Similarly, as the last IPR poll was done a long time back. We are also polling 
for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document (see RFCs 
3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).


Thank you

Brgds,


Stephane, Matthew, Jeffrey (BESS chairs)



_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to