Hi Luc André, Thanks. Those updates look good. I’m still a little hazy about what the outcomes are in a scenario with mixed compliant and non-compliant PEs, but it’s clearer than it was. I’m sure I could work it out if I were an expert, it’s just that… I’m not.
About this one: On Dec 5, 2024, at 9:04 AM, Luc Andre Burdet (lburdet) <lbur...@cisco.com> wrote: ... “advanced synch” you are correct, this is a francization – what is meant is ‘prior to failure’ i.e. “in advance”. I will update to better grammar. Prior? That is better, but I’m still left with some questions. The text from version 13: The Port-Active mode poses a challenge to synchronization since the "standby" port may be in a down state. Transitioning a "standby" port to an up state and stabilizing the network requires time. For Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB) and Layer 3 services, prior synchronization of ARP / ND caches is recommended. Additionally, associated VRF tables may need to be synchronized. For Layer 2 services, synchronization of MAC tables may be considered. How, specifically, would I be expected to accomplish prior synchronization of ARP/ND caches, VRF tables, and MAC tables? Thanks, —John
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
