Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- John Scudder's concerns about implementability are cause for alarm. I suggest this be investigated further even if the ballot is otherwise sufficient to pass. In any event, I also support his DISCUSS position. Sections 3 and 4 each contain a SHOULD that would be helped by offering guidance to implementers about when it might be appropriate to deviate, and what the impact of deviating would be on operations. If that's not really possible, maybe this ought to be a MUST or MAY. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
