Jim Guichard has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-18: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for this document. Couple of comments: Abstract: I am having trouble phasing the first sentence of the Abstract. The text says: This document specifies extensions to Ethernet VPN (EVPN) Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB) procedures specified in RFC7432 and RFC9135 to enhance the mobility mechanisms for EVPN IRB-based networks. Are the extensions for both EVPN and IRB procedures or just IRB procedures. It seems like the latter. If that is the case, then only RFC9135 is relevant and not RFC7432 (which should be removed from the text). In addition, you use both 'EVPN IRB' and 'EVPN-IRB' terms interchangeably so please pick one and use it throughout the document. Section 2: * Overlay: L3 and L2 Virtual Private Network (VPN) enabled via NVO, SRv6, or MPLS service layer encapsulation. Please provide references and expand acronyms for NVO and SRv6 as neither of these are well-known terms defined here -> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=abbrev_list _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
