Thanks for your comment. Posted a revision of the draft and it covers the comment you provided.
URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-11.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp/ HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-11 Mankamana From: Timothy Winters via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> Date: Thursday, October 31, 2024 at 5:46 AM To: int-...@ietf.org <int-...@ietf.org> Cc: bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp....@ietf.org <draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp....@ietf.org> Subject: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-09 Reviewer: Timothy Winters Review result: Ready with Nits I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>. Summary: This document specifies Point-to-Multipoint in Segment Routing tree. It's dense routing document, but overall was readable. There are no Internet area issues with this document. NIT: I noticed several RFC 6514 and 7432 references didn't have the proper links, looking like normal text. This should be addressed. Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO OBJECTION.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
