Hi All,
I see the draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-01 is in expired state, do we have
any plans to revive with the new version.
I don't see much traction in the WG for adoption. Do we have AL
configuration options provided by any vendor for uSID or Full SID.
Curious to know, if any vendor has implemented below mismatch AL case as
highlighted in red in Sec3.3: Processing at Ingress PE
2. When a non-zero AL is signaled via Route Type 3, then the
matching Route Type 1 for the Ethernet Segment is found and
checked for the presence of an SRv6 SID advertisement with the
End.DT2M behavior.
b. If the AL values in Route Type 1 and 3 are both non-zero and
not equal, then there is no usable ARG value. It also
indicates an inconsistency in signaling from the egress PE.
To avoid looping, the BUM traffic MUST NOT be forwarded for
such routes from the specific Ethernet Segment and
implementations SHOULD log an error message.
Thanks,
TULASI RAMI REDDY N
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
