Typo... out-of-office until 8 August (and not 8 October) G/ -----Original Message----- From: Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) <gunter.van_de_velde=40nokia....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 9:29 AM To: Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-hori...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; slitkows.i...@gmail.com; manka...@cisco.com; zzh...@juniper.net; Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <matthew.bo...@nokia.com> Subject: [bess] Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Hi Roman, Thanks for the review. The lead document editor is Out-of-office until 8 Oct and i know some others are out too. I hope that the remaining authors will be able to provide an update to resolve the discuss position with an IANA section update. G/ -----Original Message----- From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2024 3:58 PM To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-hori...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; slitkows.i...@gmail.com; manka...@cisco.com; zzh...@juniper.net; Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <matthew.bo...@nokia.com> Subject: [bess] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-10: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Section 5. This document creates a registry called "EVPN ESI Label Extended Community Flags" for the 1-octet Flags field in the ESI Label Extended Community [RFC7432]. ... In addition, the "Multihoming redundancy mode" field is initialized as follows: ... And the field "Split Horizon Type" is initialized as follows: ... New registrations in the "EVPN ESI Label Extended Community Flags" registry will be made through the "IETF Review" procedure defined in [RFC8126]. The above IANA guidance is ambiguous. -- How many registries are being created - one or three? The text explicitly says that a registry named "EVPN ESI Label Extended Community Flags" will be created. However, the subsequent text says that "Multihoming redundancy mode" and "Split Horizon Type" will be "initialized"? Does "initialized" mean registry creation? -- If "Multihoming redundancy mode" and "Split Horizon Type" are new registries, are they also following an IETF Review policy? The text only says that "EVPN ESI Label Extended Community Flags" uses IETF Review? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Jouni Korhonen for the GENART review. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
