Hi Wen,
There shouldn’t be any backward compatibility issue as section 8.5 states:
“Every PE is then given an ordinal
indicating its position in the ordered list, starting with 0 as
the ordinal for the PE with the lowest IP address length and
numeric value tuple. The tuple list is ordered by the IP address
length first and IP address value second.”
Because IP address length is factored into sorting the list, both IPv4 and IPv6
are allowed to be in the list. This is the expected behavior because in a
simple of dual-homing, an ES can span across two ASes with different address
families.
Cheers,
Ali
From: Wen Lin <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 at 12:47 PM
To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>,
[email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [bess] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09.txt
Hi Ali,
Thank you for providing the following text.
I think it will be helpful to mention the backward compatibility issue
regarding the change introduced in DF election (Section 8.5) as we need to
consider the possibility of originating router’s IP addresses coming in with
different IP address families.
Thanks,
Wen
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 at 1:55 PM
To: Wen Lin <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>,
[email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [bess] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09.txt
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Wen,
I am thinking of adding the following paragraph as a clarification for the
originating router’s IP address.
“The Originating Router’s IP address does not need to be a routable address and
its purpose is to identify the originator of that EVPN route uniquely. It can
be either IPv4 or IPv6 address independent of the BGP next hop address type for
that NLRI and it must remain the same for all EVPN routes advertised by that
PE.”
Cheers,
Ali
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Wen Lin <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, May 10, 2024 at 11:06 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [bess] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09.txt
Thank you for the updated draft.
I think we need to explicitly specify how we set the Originating Router’s IP
address – when it will be to IPv6 or IPv4 address for both Ethernet Segment
Route and Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route. Today, there is no
mentioning about it in the draft.
7.4.
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09*section-7.4__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!D8FxrZ9AXM1VDe0Lr_x1vfnVhlT_Aa-m2k5dfbuYNwjcHjUrl4PwNDjonwQ2by0T_aS2klGdRdmVhPe9_ee4pOSj3vUNqw$>
Ethernet Segment
Route<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09*name-ethernet-segment-route__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!D8FxrZ9AXM1VDe0Lr_x1vfnVhlT_Aa-m2k5dfbuYNwjcHjUrl4PwNDjonwQ2by0T_aS2klGdRdmVhPe9_ee4pOQZKTSEyg$>
+---------------------------------------+
| RD (8 octets) |
+---------------------------------------+
|Ethernet Segment Identifier (10 octets)|
+---------------------------------------+
| IP Address Length (1 octet) |
+---------------------------------------+
| Originating Router's IP Address |
| (4 or 16 octets) |
+---------------------------------------+
We need to add definition or reference for the Originating Router’s IP Address.
7.3.
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09*section-7.3__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!D8FxrZ9AXM1VDe0Lr_x1vfnVhlT_Aa-m2k5dfbuYNwjcHjUrl4PwNDjonwQ2by0T_aS2klGdRdmVhPe9_ee4pORjQTaKBA$>
Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag
Route<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09*name-inclusive-multicast-etherne__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!D8FxrZ9AXM1VDe0Lr_x1vfnVhlT_Aa-m2k5dfbuYNwjcHjUrl4PwNDjonwQ2by0T_aS2klGdRdmVhPe9_ee4pOSIekbGxQ$>
+---------------------------------------+
| RD (8 octets) |
+---------------------------------------+
| Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) |
+---------------------------------------+
| IP Address Length (1 octet) |
+---------------------------------------+
| Originating Router's IP Address |
| (4 or 16 octets) |
+---------------------------------------+
For IMET route, we have the following definition in section 11.1:
“The Originating Router's IP Address field value MUST be set to an IP address
of the PE that should be common for all the EVIs on the PE (e.g., this address
may be the PE's loopback address). The IP Address Length field is in bits.”
A router may have both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses configured for the loopback. We
need to specify when IPv6 address will be used based on whether EVPN is used
IPv4 or IPv6 underlay.
Thanks,
Wen
Juniper Business Use Only
From: BESS <[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected]
<[email protected]>
Date: Friday, May 3, 2024 at 12:42 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09.txt
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS (BESS) WG of the IETF.
Title: BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN
Authors: Ali Sajassi
Luc Andre Burdet
John Drake
Jorge Rabadan
Name: draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09.txt
Pages: 73
Dates: 2024-05-02
Abstract:
This document describes procedures for Ethernet VPN (EVPN), a BGP
MPLS-based solution which addresses the requirements specified in the
corresponding RFC - "Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)". This
document obsoletes RFC7432 (BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN) and updates
RFC8214 (Virtual Private Wire Service Support in Ethernet VPN).
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DQNdb1zziDhGamgqVCqazNaTWtGRyB4JfRJn_4PBJ-meIo5dUeuj3X1ZZzUL6Ak1xr3TX2QD68p6Le_VrAUK3PyL$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DQNdb1zziDhGamgqVCqazNaTWtGRyB4JfRJn_4PBJ-meIo5dUeuj3X1ZZzUL6Ak1xr3TX2QD68p6Le_VrAUK3PyL$>
There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DQNdb1zziDhGamgqVCqazNaTWtGRyB4JfRJn_4PBJ-meIo5dUeuj3X1ZZzUL6Ak1xr3TX2QD68p6Le_VrD-_D2Jy$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DQNdb1zziDhGamgqVCqazNaTWtGRyB4JfRJn_4PBJ-meIo5dUeuj3X1ZZzUL6Ak1xr3TX2QD68p6Le_VrD-_D2Jy$>
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DQNdb1zziDhGamgqVCqazNaTWtGRyB4JfRJn_4PBJ-meIo5dUeuj3X1ZZzUL6Ak1xr3TX2QD68p6Le_VrF5Wvh7P$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-09__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DQNdb1zziDhGamgqVCqazNaTWtGRyB4JfRJn_4PBJ-meIo5dUeuj3X1ZZzUL6Ak1xr3TX2QD68p6Le_VrF5Wvh7P$>
Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DQNdb1zziDhGamgqVCqazNaTWtGRyB4JfRJn_4PBJ-meIo5dUeuj3X1ZZzUL6Ak1xr3TX2QD68p6Le_VrCT0gLFF$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DQNdb1zziDhGamgqVCqazNaTWtGRyB4JfRJn_4PBJ-meIo5dUeuj3X1ZZzUL6Ak1xr3TX2QD68p6Le_VrCT0gLFF$>
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
